🔗 Share this article

Keir Starmer is facing backbench anger after ministers scrapped intentions to give workers immediate safeguards against unfair dismissal, a U-turn that breaches the Labour manifesto.

MPs Voice Concerns

Lawmakers featuring an ex-government official who led the worker protection legislation expressed apprehension over the climbdown announced by the government.

Ministers have axed the plan to remove the 24-month "qualifying period" for workers to file wrongful termination cases and allow them to do so from the first day in a new job, to facilitate passing the legislation through parliament.

Legislative Deadlock

The bill was caught in a dispute involving peers and MPs regarding the initial proposal to provide employee safeguards immediately, as well as measures to outlaw predatory flexible hour arrangements.

The government now intends to introduce the right regarding wrongful termination following half a year employment instead, although additional first-day entitlements to paternity leave and sick pay are still due to go ahead, coming into effect in the second quarter of 2026.

Resistance and Disapproval

The parliamentary representative for the Teesside area labeled the action as a "complete betrayal" and vowed to push for its overturning.

"We are unable to endorse that compromise solution."

"This is a wrong-headed move and I plan to fight to have this concession reversed."

A different party representative voiced disappointment concerning inadequate dialogue, remarking: "There has been zero consultation with party members. Peers shouldn't override over a manifesto commitment, hence what prompted our让步?"

Extended Ramifications

Another representative stated: "Businesses should not worry regarding first-day entitlements, but workers have everything to fear from businesses who doesn't want day-one rights."

The former employment minister asserted that the decision "clearly represents a broken promise."

Government Justification

The education secretary declared there was a "very real prospect" the execution of the employment rights bill would have been delayed had the administration not implemented a U-turn over first-day rights against unfair dismissal.

"Dialogue has taken place on the point around wrongful termination and the qualifying timeframe with employers, labor organizations and the administration, and following that discussion understanding has been reached regarding the path ahead, which is welcome."

She emphasized that "This indicates the qualifying period will reduce from two years to six months, and this accompanies significant first-day entitlements around sick pay and around parental leave."

"But the risk here was had advancement not occurred, those important rights might not be implemented starting spring 2026."

When questioned about whether it represented a broken promise, the secretary answered: "Throughout the campaign document, our commitment stated was that we intended to collaborate with labor organizations, with business, with civil society, in consulting on such entitlements we planned to introduce."

"So, there are both parts concerning that issue, throughout the campaign document, the significant entitlements and the dialogue."